The problem with biology education today is that there are:
1) no standards for what the major is
2) no accreditation governing what a department should comprise

Europe now has accreditation for the discipline and if the US does not
follow suit you can watch rapidly as we not only fall behind in
biology, but basically fall like a rock in stature.

Too many departments just wing it at the whim of the administrations' folly.
Accreditation provides the departments with significant support and
legitimacy in the face of those administrations that generally care a
lot about money and little about quality or students.

There are more of those than we care to admit.

Look, we can't even agree whether biodiversity concepts belong in an
intro to bio class.
I find this not only disheartening but also frightening.  Where else
they going to learn it, English?
Most schools don't have an EVS course, and many never will.


On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Bill Hilton Jr. (RESEARCH)
<> wrote:
> With sincere respect to all of you in the fields of microbiology, genetics, 
> and other laboratory-based disciplines of the life sciences, I contend the 
> "Campbell Essential Biology" approach is exactly what is wrong with biology 
> education today.
> Nearly all undergraduate and high school introductory biology courses are 
> written as if EVERY student is going on to med school, nursing, or a career 
> in a lab-based science. I agree it's important for an undergrad course to 
> make mention of cytology, DNA, photosynthesis, etc., but I question the real 
> value to students of any non-major textbook in which 12 chapters deal with 
> cell-DNA and ecology, ecosystems, and the biosphere are relegated to the last 
> three chapters.
> My guess is that 95% or more of non-majors will never have any really 
> practical use for information about cell-DNA. It's complicated stuff that 
> their physicians and pharmacists need to know, but what would be of 
> infinitely greater value is for everyone to be familiar with basic principles 
> of ecology, plant-animal interactions, pollination biology, and the like. 
> Knowing about these things will enable students in general to understand how 
> humans fit into and affect the world around them, and such understanding will 
> help them make informed decisions about such things as overfishing, 
> watersheds and wetlands, use of household pesticides and fertilizers--to say 
> nothing of current controversial topics like global climate change, fracking, 
> etc.
> We all teach what we know, of course, and the vast majority of high school 
> biology teachers know what they learned in an undergrad biology courses 
> taught from the "pre-med" perspective. I know from 25-plus years in the 
> classroom and lab that for kids not going off to med-school the "pre-med" 
> approach is often a turn-off to science, while a course that emphasizes 
> ecology, the environment, field work, etc., is a turn-on. I also taught 
> undergrad biology and know such is the case with many college students.
> Cheers,
> On May 27, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Helena Puche wrote:
>> David,
>> I used "Campbell Essential Biology" by E.J. Simon, J.B.Reece and J.L. 
>> Dickey. It is a book for non-biology  majors that has 20 chapters, all of 
>> them with a focus on evolution and examples, and nice drawings and pictures. 
>> Twelve of the 20 chapters are geared toward cell-DNA, then three chapters on 
>> taxonomy and systematics. The last three include populations & ecology, 
>> communities & ecosystems, and the biosphere. Therefore, you will have to add 
>> extra material to recreate those last topics.
>> I created  several evolution labs using beans or the web pages below, 
>> designed a ppt to introduce Darwin's liand thoughts, and added many lab 
>> activities to learn about mark-recapture techniques, estimating population 
>> growth rate & size, population growth models, climate change, and 
>> identifying biomes.
>> Evolution links to check are:
>> I used those as base for the lab activities.
>> Hope this helps.
>> Helena
>> Helena Puche, Ph. D.
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor
>> University of Illinois at Chicago
>> Biological Sciences, 3464 SES, MC
>> 066
>> 845 West Taylor Street
>> Chicago, IL
>> --- On Fri, 5/25/12, Johnson, David R <> wrote:
>> From: Johnson, David R <>
>> Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Non-Majors Biology
>> Date: Friday, May 25, 2012, 2:49 PM
>> Greetings,
>> I am teaching a "contemporary biology" course for non-science majors in the 
>> fall and for the first time I am fortunate to be able to organize the course 
>> at my discretion. Effectively, I can present any material I wish as long as 
>> I hit broad themes such as Cell Theory and Evolution. While this is 
>> certainly doable, I am struggling deciding exactly what content to present. 
>> The course is meant to present the science of contemporary issues that may 
>> be important and/or interesting to the non-science student rather than a 
>> broad survey course encompassing all of biology. There is another such 
>> survey course with a set syllabus that I am not teaching, and there are two 
>> other sections of contemporary biology that are focusing on genetics. I 
>> would like to focus on the many ecological issues that both affect and are 
>> affected by humans. My struggle involves the fact that this may be the only 
>> (or last) biology these students get before we cast them out into the world.
>> So I want to be sure and cover all my bases.
>> I am writing Ecolog with two questions. First, what is the relative merit of 
>> including as much biology as possible as opposed to focusing on fewer but 
>> perhaps more directly relevant ecological topics? These students will most 
>> likely not become scientists, and certainly won't need to memorize the 
>> structure of all the amino acids, for example. On the other hand, would I be 
>> cheating them somehow by not providing enough information to them for making 
>> informed decisions on topics outside of my direct area of expertise, such as 
>> developmental biology and stem cells?
>> The other question I have involves textbooks. Is anyone aware of a text (or 
>> perhaps pop-science books) designed for the non-science major that focuses 
>> on ecology, in particular the involvement of humans in ecological systems? I 
>> haven't been able to find something I like and am looking for 
>> recommendations.
>> Thanks and I'll circulate a summary response if/when the discussion runs its 
>> course.
>> Cheers,
>> David
>> David R. Johnson PhD.
>> Postdoctoral Research Associate
>> Systems Ecology Lab
>> University of Texas at El Paso
> P.S. Please "Like" our new Facebook page at 
> for timely updates on nature topics.
> =========
> c/o BILL HILTON JR. Executive Director
> Hilton Pond Center for Piedmont Natural History
> 1432 DeVinney Road, York, South Carolina 29745 USA
> office & cell (803) 684-5852
> fax (803) 684-0255
> Please visit our web sites (courtesy of
> Hilton Pond Center for Piedmont Natural History at
> "Operation RubyThroat: The Hummingbird Project" at
> ==================

Malcolm L. McCallum
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
School of Biological Sciences
University of Missouri at Kansas City

Managing Editor,
Herpetological Conservation and Biology

"Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" -
Allan Nation

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi)
Wealth w/o work
Pleasure w/o conscience
Knowledge w/o character
Commerce w/o morality
Science w/o humanity
Worship w/o sacrifice
Politics w/o principle

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.

Reply via email to