Yes this is under the BizManager set of products....
________________________________ From: Mike Rawlins <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 11:07:23 PM Subject: Re: [EDI-L] WebSphere mapping question hmm, Inovis "Biztalk"? I thought I knew all of our products... ;^) -- ----------------------------------------- Michael C. Rawlins, Senior Software Engineer, Inovis (a GXS Company) Sent from personal account On 7/28/2010 7:55 AM, Ken Etter wrote: > > yeah good luck with the "I hope that IBM doesn't mess with Sterling > too much > part"... That's like saying I hope that GXS doesn't mess with > Inovis too much > - which is what my company uses (Inovis Biztalk). > > But I think the wiser ones and those that have gone through other > mergers will > probably know better... > > [email protected] <mailto:edispec%40yahoo.com> > > ________________________________ > From: Peter <[email protected] <mailto:edilist%40yahoo.com>> > To: "Hurd, Richard [SLCUS]" <[email protected] > <mailto:rhurd3%40its.jnj.com>>; [email protected] > <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 8:56:27 PM > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] WebSphere mapping question > > > Richard, > I wish there was a good reason, but it has nothing to do with > technical reasons > or common sense. I'm afraid it's just corporate decision making and > group-think. > > I hope IBM doesn't mess with Sterling too much. It's been my > contention that in > > recent years the Sterling brand has been held up by essentially the > mapper and > their VAN service. We all know the story with the latter since AS2 > started > rolling and if IBM messes up the former...ugh. Because of this > WebSphere > issue, I have been dealing with I have been looking into the WebSphere > Message > Broker to learn more about it. It has a visual style mapper and then a > background code E-SQL that can be used instead of the visual mapper. > Both seem > about 10 years behind the current offerings in the EDI world. Even if > you are > doing 'space age' XML mappings! > > -Peter > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: "Hurd, Richard [SLCUS]" <[email protected] > <mailto:rhurd3%40its.jnj.com>> > To: Peter <[email protected] <mailto:edilist%40yahoo.com>>; > [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 8:26:04 AM > Subject: RE: [EDI-L] WebSphere mapping question > > > >>Perhaps this isn't as off-topic as I though since with IBM's > takeover of > >>Sterling, all the Gentran stuff might end up as WebSphere in the not > too distant > >> > >> > >>future! > > Bite yer tongue. :) > > I'm genuinely curious as to why you have a middleware component in > between your > EDI system and SAP, since the inference from your message is that your > EDI > translator can consume IDocs. Can you share that? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
