HL7 is not a transport/enveloping specification. It’s a format and data content for the actual clinical data exchange. Fax is transport.
Rachel Foerster 847-872-8070 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Earl Wertheimer Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:59 PM To: David Frenkel; [email protected] Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? David > I was in a large hospital just a couple of years ago and they were > using faxes to communicate business documents between the clinical > areas and purchasing, I doubt that has changed. Most medical clinics still use faxes to communicate. Some have switched to HL7, but until someone comes up with a simple and secure method to send emails, medical information will continue to be sent by fax. > ________________________________ > From: Skip Stein <[email protected] <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> > > To: David Frenkel <[email protected] > <mailto:frenkel%40worldnet.att.net> > > Cc: EDI-L EDI-L <[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> >; > David Frenkel <[email protected] <mailto:frenkel%40att.net> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:15 PM > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? > > > > > > Hello David, > > I don't disagree, but I don't believe many corporations are still at this > primitive level. True, many do not have decent Internet access and that is a > shame, but will change over the short term. If a company is still using > bisync and fax technology, I view that as a tremendous opportunity to help > them get current, save money and gain market share by increasing their > ability to compete. Always the consultant.... <grin>! > > Cheers, > > Skip Stein > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc. > http://www.msc-inc.net > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein > > Direct: 407-680-3914 > Cell: 407-683-6816 > Office: 800-856-3193 > Fax: 888-243-1843 > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 1:07:15 PM, you wrote: > > In this Internet, technology crazed world it is still estimated that 20% of > the people in the US do not use the Internet so there still is a market for > old technology. > > http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm > > David Frenkel > > ________________________________ > From: Skip Stein <[email protected] <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> > > To: Travis Truax <[email protected] > <mailto:travis.truax%40hannascandles.com> > > Cc: tcstoodt <[email protected] <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net> >; > [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:29 AM > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? > > Hello Travis, > > Fax? Another decades old obsolete technology. People still display 'fax > numbers' instead of email addresses. Insanity persists. Inefficient, > obsolete, time consuming and waste of energy and paper (do they still use > paper?). And companies wonder why they loose money and cut manpower instead > of making the infrastructure more efficient. Another indicator of obsolete > thinking in American businesses. What are they teaching in colleges these > days? Use of stone knives and bear claws? > > Happy Friday! > > Cheers, > > Skip Stein > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc. > http://www.msc-inc.net > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein > > Direct: 407-680-3914 > Cell: 407-683-6816 > Office: 800-856-3193 > Fax: 888-243-1843 > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 12:17:40 PM, you wrote: > > Hi Skip. No idea - He asked the question, I gave him an answer. > Seems about normal to me. Crappy old stuff just won't die. I'm trying to > diagnose a faxing problem right now..... > > Travis- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Skip Stein" <[email protected] <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> > > To: "Travis Truax" <[email protected] > <mailto:travis.truax%40hannascandles.com> > > Cc: "tcstoodt" <[email protected] <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net> >, > [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:03:15 AM > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? > > Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? Hello Travis, > > Why in the world would anyone attempt to even do this? 20 year old > technology, while great at the time (I was there!) is so error-prone and > unreliable, not to mention slower than spit running uphill. Might be fun for > a school project to show the history of telecommunications and how it has > changed but in the 'real world'? Not so much. > > Cheers, > > Skip Stein > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc. > http://www.msc-inc.net > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein > > Direct: 407-680-3914 > Cell: 407-683-6816 > Office: 800-856-3193 > Fax: 888-243-1843 > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 9:46:41 AM, you wrote: > > My first response would have been that this is a really bad idea, but it's > been so long since we used bisync - I had forgotten how slow a baud rate > those used. > Aren't they 4800 or 9600? If it's not going above like 14400, you *may* be > able to find a solid ATA that will work for you. As long as the ATA is > connected to the phone switch via a LAN, and nothing remote. Higher (read > normal) baud rates with modems or faxes in general do not work over VoIP. The > slower the better your chance of success. It would be really sad if you had > to slow your bisync down to keep it working. ;) > > Travis- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "tcstoodt" < [email protected] <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 8:10:15 AM > Subject: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? > > Hi, > Would an old bisync modem connection to a van still work if the phone line it > was using was switched from a landline to an IP phone? > Has anyone done this? We're converting to AS2 but our phone guys want to make > this switch right away. Thanks. TS > > ------------------------------------ > > ... > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, > <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> > IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ... > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, > <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> > IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 7149 (20120518) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > Earl Wertheimer [email protected] <mailto:earlw%40spe-edi.com> http://www.spe-edi.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
