random sampling has nothing to do with any particular person being selected
... but, rather, in the LONG run, making sure that sampleS will be
representative of the target population ....whether i ever get into any
random sample has no import
what is the target population here? all people who have telephones? all
people who have telephones that are listed ... ? unlisted ? all people with
and without telephones ... with those having telephones being listed? or,
including UNlisted?
if gallup uses a method that uses ONLY random sampling of all telephone
subscribers (residential) ... then in the LONG run ... samples would
reflect that ... but, when they do sampling ... it is a SHORT RUN deal ...
so, to insure that all of the important categories are included ... they
would have to know aHEAD of time who fits into which category ...
thus ...
i will make the assumption that gallup CAN (if it desires) separate listed
numbers from UNlisted numbers ... does anyone have any specific
documentation that says otherwise?
that is ... i assume that gallup could (if they knew that about 2% of all
#s were unlisted) ... ask the "computer" (or dictate to the group that does
the selection) to stratify their sample so that about 2% are from the
unlisted category ... thus guaranteeing some UNlisted representation in
their sample ... on the spot ... in the SHORT RUN
does anyone know if that is true or not?
if it were true, which i assume is the case, then ... the rules are not the
same for sampling ... you and i have no way of assuring that UNlisted
numbers could be found if we wanted to do a poll ... but, gallup could
it's not the ability to contact ME specifically (if my # is unlisted), it
is the ability to absolutely know that some of their sample WILL be from
the UNlisted category ...
no one else who wants to do telephone sampling ... has any way to guarantee
that
thus, they do know something about phone subscribers ... that, the average
joe or mary does not
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
. http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ .
=================================================================
- Gallup organization on polling methods Jill Binker
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods dennis roberts
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Jay Warner
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods dennis roberts
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Olsen Chris
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods dennis roberts
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods dennis roberts
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Smith, David W.
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Olsen Chris
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods dennis roberts
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Paul Bernhardt
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Paul Bernhardt
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Jay Warner
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Paul Bernhardt
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Humberto Barreto
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Rich Ulrich
- Re: Gallup organization on polling methods Humberto Barreto
