Jean-Baptiste Nizet wrote:
> I also added in my previous mail : ROFL (which means "Rolling On the Floor
>Laughing").
> Have you read my mail carefully? It was cynical. You can't be serious.
>
> First of all, when you downloaded J2EERI, you accepted an agreement containing this
> sentence :
> "3.2 Except as otherwise provided by law, Licensee may not modify or create
>derivative
> works of the Licensed Software, or reverse engineer, disassemble or decompile binary
> portions of the Licensed Software, or otherwise attempt to derive the source code
>from
> such portions."
Maybe you should spend some time researching how many EJB containers are already out
there and
the growth rate!!
> So, if you really start to reverse-engineer J2EE-RI and keep shouting it everywhere,
>be
> prepared to be sued by Sun before having even sold one copy of your software.
It has nothing to do with me offering an EJB container. I don't wite EJB containers
anymore,
but the fact that the J2EE-RI is open source means that their is a good chance that
others
will not follow the licensing agreement.
> Second, if you really didn't find any interesting additional feature in other EJB
> container, then you must not have read their doc and tested them very much. Have you
>ever
> wondered why Sun and Netscape are selling (at a huge price) iPlanet 6.0, which is a
>J2EE
> platform. J2EE-RI is a toy.
It's not about wondering it's about facts. What are the new features in detail? How
about some
bullets!!!
> It can't be used seriously for any large-scale (we call it
> "enterprise", as in J2EE) application.
But that's true about most of the containers out there. They really don't scale very
well,
don't offer real CMP, no IDEs, etc. It's not a good idea to pretend that the EJB
containers
don't have problems.
> And if you compare the level of stability,
> scalability and performance of your product to the one of Tomcat or J2EE-RI, prepare
> yourself not to sell one copy of your software.
Writing a thread pool is not that difficult if you know how to program. When something
is open
source you can make it scale if your a professional!!!!
> (To enlighten you : Tomcat is also a
> reference implementation of the servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1 specs, and the JDBC-ODBC
>bridge is
> a piece of crap explicitely described by Sun as a development and test only software,
> which should never be used in a real production environment).
>
OK so why not just list the additional features that you find so interesting!
>
> Regarding the Connector architecture, it's still a draft spec!
And what's that supposed to mean.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
