Virtual Box is free for non-commercial users. You've got to have some
pretty good hardware meaning dual core processor, as much memory as you
can afford and a good video card.
I have it running on a quad core AMD @ 4.0GHz, 32G of DDR3 ram, and a
small time gamer class video card. I have four virtual machines
installed, XP, Win7 which gets used the most, Windows 10, and for old
times sake DOS 6.22 to run Castle Wolfenstein. The hard drives are a
pair of 512 Gig SSD's. I don't run an Linux distro VM because the
accessibility options for the Linux desktop just plain suck compared to
Windows.
You can run Windows on a Linux/FreeBSD host and don't have to dork
around trying to get WINE running correctly. WINES days are numbered.
On 7/31/2016 10:28 AM, a45wg wrote:
Mike,
What you are possibly getting a little confused is
WINE - which sort of allows Windows executables to run in a Linux
environment. How well this solution works depends upon the Application, and the
DLL’s. This was initially intended for XP/Win NT. Since lots of Windows apps
are now .NET Assemblies this is more tricky to use, as Mono has not been fully
embraced by the Open-Source community.
Virtualisation - Oracle-Virtual Box (KVM and VMware) allows you to run
a different OS (Operating System) machine in another environment (in this case
in a Linux Environment). This solution is the most stable - but at the costs of
further enriching a large US Multi-National. A very good technique and one used
in Data Centres around the world.
Welcome on-board - there may be a few bumps on the way - but you are at
least on the right path.
73s - A45WG
Tim, Muscat: Sultanate of Oman
On 31 Jul 2016, at 19:18, Mike Rhodes <w...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
Ok, I already see I have misunderstood something. I mistakenly thought Wine
was an emulator that would allow you to run a copy of Windows on Linux where it
is actually a Windows on Linux simulator. That answers at least part of my
question.
Mike / W8DN
On 7/31/2016 11:14 AM, Mike Rhodes wrote:
Ok, I am not a Unix/Linux user. Years ago I did a little C programming on a
real-time Unix box but have forgotten way more than I learned about that system
(and C).
However, I have to ask the question - what is the point of getting away from "windoze"
by going to a Linux box and then immediately slapping a fully licensed copy of "Windoze",
running under an emulator, on that Linux box. It just seems not only counter-intuitive but
counter-productive. Since the majority of the apps that I wish to run are strictly Windows based,
it just seems to make more sense to run the real thing natively. If the intent is to not add more
to the Gates billions then you have defeated that by running under an emulator.
Mike / W8DN
On 7/31/2016 10:39 AM, Matt Zilmer wrote:
All the Elecraft utilities I use work fine on Wine, under Ubuntu 16.04. Using Wine
dodges the multiarch requirement, and it seems 100% compatible with all Windoze API
calls the utilities make. If you decide to go this way, you'll have to make a
symlink between /dev/tty<whatever> to COM1 in dos_devices. If your serial port
under Linux is /dev/ttyUSB0, in a terminal type
ln -s /dev/ttyUSB0 ~/.wine/dosdevices/com1
[Also, see
http://askubuntu.com/questions/685985/symbolic-link-between-usb-and-com-port].
The Linux native utilities are ported from Win32 to the Linux 32-bit API.
73,
matt W6NIA
On 7/31/2016 4:01 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2016 30 Jul 20:39 -0500, Bill wrote:
I am only interested in how well the Elecraft provided software under Linux
works? I do not use any third party stuff at all. Is it as easy and straight
forward as their Windows software?
K3 Utility, KPA Utility, etc.
Be aware that the Elecraft utilities are only available in 32 bit
versions at this time. If you use a distribution that allows
'multiarch', and Mint should being a Debian derivative, you will need
i386 architecture enabled if your base architecture is amd64. Ubuntu,
and probably Mint, have this enabled on amd64 installations. You will
probably have to manually install the i386 versions of some libraries.
It sounds like more of a hassle than it really is.
73, Nate
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to a4...@sy-edm.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net
--
R. Kevin Stover
AC0H
ARRL
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
