Leigh L. Klotz Jr WA5ZNU wrote: > > What would you like out of PSK D and FSK D? We could consider adding it > to fldigi if there are advantages. > I'm not really sure what advantages there are to using PSK D or FSK D. Having to receive PSK by accurately tuning in a signal instead of clicking on a waterfall is not a usability improvement, and the sound card decoders do a better job of decoding weak PSK signals than the one in the K3. RTTY may be better - I haven't really tried it.
Most people who have a computer connected to the radio have the use of a sound card, so the only reason for trying this would seem to be "because you can." If Elecraft provides a way to read the decoded text into the software at the same time as using CAT then I will support it in KComm. But I can't see that I would ever use it in preference to a sound card. ----- Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222. * G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Best-Digital-Program-for-the-K3-tp4534355p4535912.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
