Hi All,

Here is one interesting margins vs. winning votes example for you to consider. I don't remember having seen this type of scenario. But with good probability someone has already analysed this, so please provide some pointers if this has been discussed on the list or elsewhere.

The example is a bit more complex than it would need to be. That is because I prefer presenting it as a real life example instead of a theoretical extreme case. This example fits nicely within the framework of the the US presidential elections. Few observations follow.

20      A
15      ABC
10      ACB
35      BC
20      CB

- Democrats have nominated candidate A.
- Republicans have nominated two candidates. In addition to their normal mainstream candidate B they have nominated also a right wing candidate C.
- All voters have taken position on Democrats vs. Republicans.
- Some Democrat voters have not taken position on the Republican internal battle between B and C.
- All Republican voters have taken position on B vs. C.
- Democrats prefer B over C.
- Republicans prefer B over C.
- B is the Condorcet winner.
- In raking based real life elections it seems to be quite common that voters don't give full rankings. This example has only three candidates and therefore full rankings could be quite common. But the election could have also considerably more than three candidates, in which case partial rankings probably would be quite common. It is probable that ranking candidates of competing party is less common than ranking candidates of ones own party (just like in this example).

Now, what if some of the the 20 C supporters (C>B voters) would note the weak position of C before the election and decide to vote strategically C>A>B. - in the case of winning votes C wins the election with 6 to 20 strategic votes (out of the 20 C>B votes) => quite efficient and risk free (if one has reliable opinion poll results available) (and if others don't use other strategies) - in the case of margins A wins the election with 11 to 20 strategic votes (out of the 20 C>B votes)
    => not very promising as a strategy

Yours,
Juho

----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to