Dave Ketchum wrote > > I think we should charge Paul with throwing mud. > > Juho has created a couple examples packaged as basic tie > elections, with > one extra vote added in that gives the odd voter full control > as to winner > under wv rules. > > Paul notes - as a big deal - that by not starting with a tie, > the results > would be different.
Paul noted nothing of the sort. So Dave Ketchum is "throwing mud". Paul noted that there is a qualitative difference between 3-alternative and 2-alternative elections. If Dave wants to dispute that, he is free to disprove Arrow's Theorem and after he gets a Nobel Prize for that he can accuse Paul of throwing mud. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
