election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2000/03/03 Re: Approval Vote: reply to Bart Ingles Bart Ingles
• 2000/03/03 Re: Approval Voting fish (3) Craig Carey
• 2000/03/03 Re: Approval Voting fish (2) Craig Carey
• 2000/03/03 Re: Approval Vote: reply to Bart Ingles Craig Carey
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Vote: reply to Bart Ingles Blake Cretney
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval -- clarification Bart Ingles
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Vote: reply to Bart Ingles Bart Ingles
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Voting fish--error explained MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Vote: reply to Bart Ingles Craig Carey
• 2000/03/02 RE: Approval DEMOREP1
• 2000/03/02 Re: Ratings as a standard DEMOREP1
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Voting fish Craig Carey
• 2000/03/02 Re: Approval Bart Ingles
• 2000/03/02 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/03/02 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/03/02 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/03/01 Re: [EM] Method definitions (remainder of reply) Norman Petry
• 2000/03/01 Re: Tideman and GMC DEMOREP1
• 2000/03/01 Re: [EM] Method definitions (remainder of reply) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/03/01 Re: Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/29 Re: [EM] Method definitions (partial reply) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/29 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/29 [EM] Method definitions Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/29 [EM] Clone Defeats Revised Example DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/28 [EM] Method definitions Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC David Catchpole
• 2000/02/28 Re: Approval Craig Carey
• 2000/02/28 Re: Happy99 worm Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/28 Re: Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/28 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/28 [EM] FWD - Reducing SNTV seats by more than one Donald E Davison
• 2000/02/27 Re: [EM] Approval Voting Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/27 [EM] Approval Voting DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/27 Re: [EM] Journals on the Internet Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/27 Re: [EM] Journals on the Internet Craig Carey
• 2000/02/27 Re: [EM] Journals on the Internet Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/27 Re: Non-votes aren't half-votes. Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/27 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/27 [EM] Brams & Fishburn Condorcet definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/27 RE: Non-votes aren't half-votes. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/27 RE: Non-votes aren't half-votes. DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/26 [EM] Journals on the Internet Craig Carey
• 2000/02/26 RE: Non-votes aren't half-votes. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/26 [EM] No specified turnout MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots David Catchpole
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] Craig Carey and None of the Rest Craig Carey
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Steve Eppley
• 2000/02/26 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots David Catchpole
• 2000/02/26 [EM] Craig Carey and None of the Rest Donald E Davison
• 2000/02/26 RE: Non-votes aren't half-votes. DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/25 [EM] Non-votes aren't half-votes. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/25 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 Re: Tideman and GMC DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/24 Re: pairwise matrices and ballots DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/24 RE: Fwd: Defensive strategy criteria for voting systems DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/24 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 [EM] Why SSD is a Cycle Condorcet method MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 [EM] Criterion compliance demonstrations MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 [EM] Criterion compliance demonstrations MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 [EM] Fwd: Defensive strategy criteria for voting systems MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/24 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/24 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/24 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/23 [EM] Re: "None of the Rest" DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/23 [EM] Tideman Properties Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/23 Re: the anti-middle strategy examples with Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/23 [EM] pairwise matrices and ballots Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] "None of ..." -- Negative votes Craig Carey
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] Dollar example Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/23 Re: Dollar example Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] Dollar example Steve Eppley
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] "None of the Rest" Steve Eppley
• 2000/02/23 [EM] New names for Weak DSC and Strong DSC? (was Re: the anti-middle strategy examples with Condorcet) Steve Eppley
• 2000/02/23 Beatpath criterion, Tideman, and BCM (was Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC) Steve Eppley
• 2000/02/23 [EM] PBS Greeks and Democracy Show DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/23 RE: Dollar example DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/23 RE: Condorcet same as Approval with partial info? DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/23 Re: [EM] "None of ..." -- Negative votes Craig Carey
• 2000/02/23 [EM] "None of the Rest" Donald E Davison
• 2000/02/23 [EM] Dollar example Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/23 Re: the anti-middle strategy examples with Condorcet Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/22 Re: the anti-middle strategy examples with Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/20 Re: [EM] Condorcet same as Approval with partial info? Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/20 [EM] Correction Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/20 [EM] Condorcet same as Approval with partial info? Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/20 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/20 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/20 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/20 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/20 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/19 RE: Circular tie solutions should be obvious DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/18 [EM] Not trying to take credit. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/18 [EM] Compromise strategy? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/17 [EM] New Condorcet versions, & a classification for them MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2000/02/15 [EM] Circular tie solutions should be obvious DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/12 Re: [EM] Re: Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/12 [EM] Re: Ratings as a standard DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/12 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/02/09 [EM] Axioms P3, P2, Truncation Resistance, and 2 candidate solution Craig Carey
• 2000/02/09 Pairwise Vote Terminology (was Re: "Votes over" (Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as)) Norman Petry
• 2000/02/08 Re: "Votes over" (Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as) Norman Petry
• 2000/02/08 "Votes over" (Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as) Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/08 [EM] Mathematical formulation for truncation resistance Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/08 Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/08 Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as Norman Petry
• 2000/02/07 Re: [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as Blake Cretney
• 2000/02/07 [EM] Clones in Circular Ties DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/07 [EM] Why Margins isn't as democratic or ethical as votes-against (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/06 [EM] =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?Re=3A_=5BEM=5D_=28P1=29_tweak_up_=2E=2E=2E_Qu? = =?x-unknown?q?=E9bec_Ombudsman=2C_=22rank=22?= David Catchpole
• 2000/02/06 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC David Catchpole
• 2000/02/06 RE: Debian pairwise voting (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/06 RE: Debian pairwise voting (fwd) DEMOREP1
• 2000/02/05 [EM] Debian pairwise voting (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/04 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up ... Qu�bec Ombudsman, "rank" Craig Carey
• 2000/02/03 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/02/02 [EM] Pairwise voting in use: Debian Project Rob Lanphier
• 2000/02/01 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up ... Qu�bec Ombudsman, "rank" Craig Carey
• 2000/02/01 [EM] Markus Schulze
• 2000/01/31 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/31 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/31 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Craig Carey
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/30 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/29 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC David Catchpole
• 2000/01/29 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC David Catchpole
• 2000/01/29 Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC Markus Schulze
• 2000/01/26 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Craig Carey
• 2000/01/25 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/01/24 [EM] Another look at Tideman Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/24 [EM] Tideman and GMC Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Ratings as a standard Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 David Catchpole
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 David Catchpole
• 2000/01/24 [EM] U.S. high court limits federal voting rights power DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/24 [EM] Ratings as a standard Bart Ingles
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Bart Ingles
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Craig Carey
• 2000/01/24 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 Craig Carey
• 2000/01/23 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 David Catchpole
• 2000/01/23 [EM] Labour must re-commit to UK vote reform - Lib Dems DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/23 Re: [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/23 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 Craig Carey
• 2000/01/23 Re: [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 Craig Carey
• 2000/01/22 [EM] (P1) tweak up of AV meth. using random walk may fail (slow) Craig Carey
• 2000/01/22 [EM] California Open Primary Draws US Supreme Court Scrutiny DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/21 [EM] Alaska Internet Voting (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/19 [EM] California Internet Voting Task Force Report (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/18 [EM] Proposed Revised U.S.A. Constitution, 18 Jan 2000 DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/17 [EM] ERS Commission on Electronic Voting (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/16 [EM] Candidate vote transfer p.r. method, 16 Jan 2000 DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/16 [EM] Yet Another PR method Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/12 Re: [EM] Converting super-majorities to margins Bart Ingles
• 2000/01/11 [EM] Criteria and the Smith Set Rob Lanphier
• 2000/01/10 Re: [EM] Converting super-majorities to margins Rob Lanphier
• 2000/01/10 [EM] Election Law Book DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/09 [EM] Converting super-majorities to margins Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/09 [EM] Super-majorities in ranked methods Blake Cretney
• 2000/01/09 [EM] Britain will get PR referendum, Cook says DEMOREP1
• 2000/01/09 [EM] Test message Rob Lanphier
• 1999/12/30 [EM] Final results of Russia Duma poll for party lists DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/29 [EM] U.S. and State Gerrymander Data DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/29 RE: Candidate List DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/29 [EM] Candidate List Donald E Davison
• 1999/12/28 [EM] CIVI Title and Summary Released (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/28 Re: [EM] Low tech p.r. election method. Craig Carey
• 1999/12/27 [EM] Low tech p.r. election method 27 Dec 1999 DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/23 [EM] Low tech p.r. election method. DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/23 [EM] TABLE-Russia final election results and seats DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/22 [EM] Gerrymander map/cartoon DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/22 [EM] PhD Thesis on voting schemes (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/21 [EM] The Second Treatise of Government DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/20 Re: Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not be David Catchpole
• 1999/12/20 Re: Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not be Craig Carey
• 1999/12/17 Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better David Catchpole
• 1999/12/17 RE: (P1) defined David Catchpole
• 1999/12/16 [EM] NZ Percent Seats- Percent Votes DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/16 Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better Craig Carey
• 1999/12/15 RE: (P1) defined DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/15 Re: [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better David Catchpole
• 1999/12/15 [EM] (P1) defined Craig Carey
• 1999/12/15 Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing Markus Schulze
• 1999/12/15 [EM] Cloning: 2nd preference doing worse is implied by (P1) Craig Carey
• 1999/12/15 [EM] Pattanaik and Peleg's 'Regularity' is not better Craig Carey
• 1999/12/14 [EM] P.R. Hearing text- P.R. Speech DEMOREP1
• 1999/12/14 Re: FPTP family theory, REDLOG shadowing DEMOREP1

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]