election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2006/04/12 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
• 2006/04/12 Re: [EM] decision process design: wealth tax James Green-Armytage
• 2006/04/11 Re: [EM] decision process design: wealth tax Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/11 Re: [EM] A simpler way to count proportional approval voting Antonio Oneala
• 2006/04/11 Re: [EM] decision process design: wealth tax James Green-Armytage
• 2006/04/10 [EM] A simpler way to count proportional approval voting Antonio Oneala
• 2006/04/10 Re: [EM] decision process design: wealth tax mrouse1
• 2006/04/10 Re: [EM] decision process design: wealth tax mrouse1
• 2006/04/10 [EM] Oscars Don St. Jean
• 2006/04/10 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
• 2006/04/09 [EM] decision process design: wealth tax James Green-Armytage
• 2006/04/09 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dan Bishop
• 2006/04/08 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/08 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Paul Kislanko
• 2006/04/08 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/08 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/04/07 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/07 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
• 2006/04/06 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/04/06 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/06 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering raphfrk
• 2006/04/05 Re: [EM] Policy change: non-subscriber mails automatically rejected Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/05 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dan Bishop
• 2006/04/04 [EM] Policy change: non-subscriber mails automatically rejected Rob Lanphier
• 2006/04/04 [EM] Ree: IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Antonio Oneala
• 2006/04/04 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/04 Re: [EM] IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Kevin Venzke
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Anthony Duff
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Paul Kislanko
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Paul Kislanko
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
• 2006/04/03 Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
• 2006/04/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality (six variations) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/04/01 [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Steve Eppley
• 2006/03/30 [EM] proxies and confidentiality (six variations) James Green-Armytage
• 2006/03/29 [EM] Forwarded from Steven Hill, re. his new book "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy". Chris Benham
• 2006/03/28 [EM] IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Antonio Oneala
• 2006/03/22 [EM] What algorithms are there to find the Smith/Schwartz set? Gervase Lam
• 2006/03/22 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet James Gilmour
• 2006/03/22 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Anthony Duff
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Simmons, Forest
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Anthony Duff
• 2006/03/21 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/20 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Gervase Lam
• 2006/03/20 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet RaphFrk
• 2006/03/19 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/19 Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Dan Bishop
• 2006/03/18 [EM] Straight Approval or PAV? Gervase Lam
• 2006/03/18 [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet raphfrk
• 2006/03/17 [EM] Vermont Lawmakers may order study of statewide instant runoff voting Jan Kok
• 2006/03/15 Re: [EM] On IRV compressability Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/15 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/15 [EM] Condorcet & Burying Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/15 Re: [EM] On IRV compressability Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/15 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/15 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result RLSuter
• 2006/03/14 [EM] On IRV compressability Brian Olson
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result raphfrk
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Rob LeGrand
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dgamble997
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Brian Olson
• 2006/03/14 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Brian Olson
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/13 [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result radio deli
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/13 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
• 2006/03/12 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/12 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/12 [EM] Fwd: Greenspan Predicts 2008 (Perot Type) Independent Presidential Candidate Jan Kok
• 2006/03/11 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/11 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Rob LeGrand
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/03/10 Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• 2006/03/10 [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result bql
• 2006/03/09 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jan Kok
• 2006/03/09 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/09 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/09 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/07 Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] line item veto Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] line item veto Jan Kok
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/06 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/05 Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/05 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/05 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method raphfrk
• 2006/03/05 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/05 Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/04 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - DP and proxy questions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/04 Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
• 2006/03/04 [EM] average over time proportionality election method raphfrk
• 2006/03/04 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - BeyondPolitics.org Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/03 Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/03 [EM] consumable votes for a legislature raphfrk
• 2006/03/03 [EM] DP in a legislature Dave Ketchum
• 2006/03/02 Re: [EM] Invitation to a new discussion Simmons, Forest
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Political Party FAs? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - "Unfocused" FAs? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Special Purpose FAs Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Invitation to a new discussion Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/02 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Should FAs be inclusive? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - What is FA for? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jiri Räsänen
• 2006/03/02 [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Preface Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/02 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jan Kok
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality RLSuter
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Eric Gorr
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/03/01 Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/02/28 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 [EM] an example of how FA/DP democracy could solve a major problem: spam Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" - a "Vote for me" request. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 [EM] real-world consequences of election methods Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/02/28 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/28 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/27 Re: [EM] three papers Jeffrey O'Neill
• 2006/02/27 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" - a "Vote for me" request. Jeff Wegerson
• 2006/02/27 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jiri Räsänen
• 2006/02/27 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Simmons, Forest
• 2006/02/26 Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/02/25 [EM] three papers Jeffrey O'Neill
• 2006/02/14 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jiri Räsänen
• 2006/02/14 [EM] Papers on Schulze Method Markus Schulze
• 2006/02/06 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? James Green-Armytage
• 2006/02/06 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
• 2006/02/06 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Markus Schulze
• 2006/02/06 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
• 2006/02/06 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
• 2006/02/05 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/02/05 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Scott Ritchie
• 2006/02/05 Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Paul Kislanko
• 2006/02/05 [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jiri Räsänen
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Paul Kislanko
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Anthony Duff
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 James Gilmour
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dharmadeva
• 2006/01/15 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Scott Ritchie
• 2006/01/14 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
• 2006/01/14 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dharmadeva
• 2006/01/14 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Scott Ritchie
• 2006/01/14 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
• 2006/01/13 Re: [EM] Abstaining from voting Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2006/01/12 [EM] Abstaining from voting Dharmadeva
• 2006/01/12 Re: [EM] Abstaining from voting James Gilmour
• 2006/01/12 [EM] Abstaining from voting PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
• 2006/01/12 [EM] Bucklin PR ? Chris Benham
• 2006/01/05 [EM] Wiki featuring Voting Systems today. Anthony Duff
• 2005/12/30 Re: [EM] Uncontested elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/12/30 Re: [EM] Uncontested elections Dave Ketchum
• 2005/12/29 Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Chris Benham
• 2005/12/29 [EM] Uncontested elections PROUT - Progressive Utilisation

• Earlier messages
• Later messages