---- On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:29:56 +0100 Bruno Barbier
> IIUC, what Max is saying is that you should not concentrate on
> *that specific command* because that command doesn't do what you think
> it does.
Cool, it sounds like we're agreed (albeit for different reasons).
> To reproduce, I'm personally still using:
>
> cat /tmp/test.sh | bash
>
> which is, IIUC, what:
>
> (process-file "bash" "/tmp/test.sh")
Yes, agreed. I think that's more like what's happening.
What about the ("-c" "bash") passed into process-file?
The whole call looks like this:
(process-file
"bash"
"/tmp/two-lines.sh"
'(t "/tmp/babel-mS0Yyg/ob-error-AoxNqH")
nil
"-c" "bash")
