On 19/11/2025 00:42, Racoon Chimp wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025, at 17:10, Max Nikulin wrote:
Perhaps the only viable solution is to convince authors of videos to
publish them on some free platform.
why do you feel the need to make others do something you want? why not
you obtain their consent to report to such a site? i bet people would be
more open to such an arrangement.
maybe i am missing your fine irony
The only irony is one that I realized after I sent the message. If delay
of 8s is not acceptable then the answer is total monopoly of single
video hosting, so "everybody" has it in warm cache. I am in doubts if it
would be usable by those who blocks non-free JS.
I am just trying to figure out if it is possible to avoid conflict with
FSF policy (I disagree with some points, but currently it does not
matter) and to not break other things. I suspect, there is some risk of
shadow ban in search engines due to links to alternative front-ends.
Actually I am surprised that when some site is considered
non-legitimate, its alternative front-ends may be acceptable.
And sorry, it is not clear for me, what you propose to solve the problem.
