>What is it that you can do free Chris?  With all the emails you receive 
>and send I would think that whatever you do about SPAM it has a cost to 
>it in time and since you are in business then time is money.

I hear this argument ALL the time, and it is simply WRONG.

Spending x number of hours at $$/hr does NOT equate to a direct savings 
if you can spend less on a solution that will take fewer hours. The 
falacy with the argument is, it assumes A: you have an unlimited amount 
of money to spend in exchange for time, and B: that by spending money, 
the $$/hr on time saved will then not be spent.

In most real world situations, neither A nor B are true, and thus the 
argument fails. Budget is limited, and needs to be spent as needed, and 
hourly wages may be paid regardless of which projects someone is working 
on.

So in the business world, if I pay $100 to prevent doing two hours of 
work, all I've done is saved myself two hours on that project BUT cost my 
budget $100 that would not have otherwise been spent. I still get paid 
for the same two hours regardless of the fact that I didn't work on 
stopping spam. I got to work on something else, but I was still paid for 
two hours. So the spam prevention just cost me $100 more to outsource 
then it would have if I had just done the work myself.


Take yourself as an example. How much time have you wasted working on 
someone else's iMac instead of just buying yourself a new computer. Based 
on your own idea, wouldn't it have been better to just buy a new computer 
and not waste so much of your time? Your statement says that is so... but 
I already know the real answer. NO, it isn't better. Why, because you 
can't afford a new computer. So for you, time is your only currency. It 
doesn't matter if you have to spend 500 hours that could be saved if you 
bought a new computer. There is no money for a new computer, so you spend 
the only thing you can, your time.

The fact that you are a person and not a business is irrelivant. For 99% 
of businesses, the two are exactly the same (the places the arguments 
work are places like Microsoft, where they DO have an unlimited amount of 
money to spend in exchange for time. But businesses, or people, where it 
holds true are in the extreme minority of business and people that end up 
having the idea pushed on them)


So like I said, the argument is simply wrong in the real world.

-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  or  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to