Re: Do we finally see an end for Emailer?

[Tyrone Griffin]

On Jun 15, 2005, at 9:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bill McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: June 15, 2005 3:22:27 PM EDT To: Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <emailer-talk@eskimo.com>, "David Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Do we finally see an end for Emailer? On Jun 15, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Don wrote: As THIS list dissipates over the next few years, I can't imagine the conditions getting better to launch such a project... and over time people will slowly find other solutions unless the project were to be underway well enough to be ready to replace as is needed. I suppose its heresy to say it hear, but what if someone has or will soon develop another solution- another email program-� that is actually acceptable so that no project would be necessary. In that regard, the current MacWorld, in its article about the new features of Tiger, said that Mail 2.0 was significantly improved. Could it be that it is now an acceptable substitute for Emailer for most of us? I posted to this list asking if anyone had tried it and asked for their opinion, but got no replies. I'm not sure whether the lack of replies means that its not an acceptable substitute, or just means that the question was not acceptable on this list of diehards. Bill McIntyre Sorry, I missed that question. I use Mail 2.0. It's not bad, but for the life of me, why have they not included the ability to update a mail group list (add and delete) based on what's in the subject line??� Emailer was doing that, what, 10 years ago?