On Saturday 02 May 2020 04:46:52 Phill Carter wrote:

> > On 2 May 2020, at 5:32 pm, Reinhard <reinha...@schwarzrot-design.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Samstag, 2. Mai 2020, 08:22:05 CEST Jared McLaughlin wrote:
> >> In my opinion, linuxcnc should be more like a distro that
> >> you install packages on. The UI's should be packages that are not
> >> maintained by the main development team.
> >
> > That makes sense
>
> I really don't see a problem with having the UI's as part of LinuxCNC
>
> >> I also agree with the idea that a cleaned up "new version" should
> >> be considered for the next major release.
> >
> > Would be nice!
> >
> >> I have used PathPilot and it seems a lot better than the other
> >> LinuxCNC UI's I poked at before. That said, I feel like even
> >> PathPilot has a long way to go ...
> >
> > Well, I'm the creator of JCNCScreen.
> >
> > The reason, why I started with such a big time-consuming work was,
> > that none of the existing UIs was really usable for me (including
> > PathPilot and others).
> >
> > I'm bit outdated, so I can't read axis and the like, that don't
> > respect proposals of window manager (i.e. like fontsize). Even on my
> > desktop pc I need glasses and put my nose onto the screen to be able
> > to read axis …
>
> It is relatively easy to change the font size in Axis.
>
> > For me, it is important, that I'm able to recognize the most
> > important states of the machine at a glance. Even from a distance of
> > about 4-5 meters. None of the UI offers this. Most if not all are
> > too noisy - and you need several seconds to find out, what is
> > relevant and what is just high-polishing for non-machinists - and
> > even then: not every important state is visible. Of cause, that does
> > not mean, that I want to read gcode from that distance, but
> > important machine states should be recognizable.
>
> Kind of a catch 22, the more states displayed the noisier it becomes.
>
> > Another problem is, that neither pyqt, nor gscreen runs on my
> > desktop box. I don't know enuf of python to solve that problems on
> > my own and it does not help, if others state, that they don't have
> > problems.
> > So I started with java, where I know to solve my own problems.
> > Startup may be too slow, but response time of the running app is
> > fast enuf for anything.
>
> I imagine I would have the same issues with a Java UI if it didn't
> run.
>
> > I don't really need my own UI - if another UI would offer, what I'm
> > looking for, it would be just fine.
>
> I don't think there will ever be a GUI that suits more than a few.
>
This is true. I still use axis although I have looked at some of the 
others, its seems like I always come back to axis, primarily because 
with pyvcp, I can bend it to do what I want. No two of my axis setups 
look alike. But I also get the impression that some of whats currently 
available no longer have a support person to answer setup questions, and 
those s/b reduced to honerable mentions. 

My biggest squawk about our gui's in general is the microscopic halmeter. 
It needs about a 4x magnification so it can be read from 3 meters away 
on a 22" screen when troubleshooting a home switch or whatever its set 
to watch.

> Cheers, Phill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to