+1 for focussing on quality over quantity. 1 UI is minimum due to having a reference implementation for the interfaces as well as being able to test the overall complete SW system once before it goes into release. Axis could be this reference UI. Then put the one fancy most promising UI with big fanbase and most maintainers into the pot as well.
Just my 2 cents. Am Sa., 2. Mai 2020 um 18:29 Uhr schrieb Jon Elson <el...@pico-systems.com>: > On 05/02/2020 05:13 AM, andy pugh wrote: > > On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 10:15, Phill Carter <phillcarte...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I really don't see a problem with having the UI's as part of LinuxCNC > > Many folk already complain that LinuxCNC is too difficult to set up. I > > think that we would lose a lot of new users at the point that they > > finished installing LinuxCNC and then found that they had to then go > > off and find and install a user interface. > > > Yes, and another thing would be when something doesn't > work. If we maintain a "standard" > GUI, such as Axis, we could always tell them to try the same > program or operation with Axis > and see if you get a similar error. > > Jon > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
