Cortland Richmond wrote: > The rules governing EMC are based on real physical principles... > However, I get the impression you are not protesting this particular set of > standards, but instead, the way regulations appear to be interpreted > making it impossible to meet a standard those same regulations require. > Is that right?
That's your point of view. Re-read previous messages. > The typical cost here in the USA is over $US 1000 for each day of testing. Its above $US 2000/day in Belgium. > That's why there's an emphasis on doing as much as you can with what you > can get, BEFORE sending the product out for testing. The BEFORE aspect was and is my first comment: SHEAP pre-compliance test equipment. Do you have any "real" sugestions for it? Purshase of OLD equipment.. every body is looking for used equipment as everybody is facing the same problem. Anyhow, to my opignion this solution is still expensive. For pre-compliance tests, before Lab, there is only a limit excedance estimate test required. > There's only one answer to that: You should at least consult an EMI lab in > Belgium about your alternatives. They have already gone through what you > are experiencing, and found a way around it. It will cost you money! > But won't it end up saving you much more? That's where it all started, expences! > Cortland By the way Cortland, are you employed or involved with HP? Happy New Year to all of you! -- Paul Rampelbergh Wezembeek-Oppem (Belgium) -------------------------
