You can check out the SCC website at www.scc.ca
<http://www.scc.ca> , click on "accreditations" and then "certification
orgs" and type in the name of your favorite test lab (or your least favorite
as the case may be :-) )to see if they are a CO. You can try a general
search for "laboratories" but it did not tun up all of the laboratories that
I knew were CO's, I had better luck searching for specific laboratories.
Kevin Robinson
Project Engineer/QA
MET Laboratories
Phone: (410) 354-3300x361
Fax: (410) 354-3313
E-Mail: krobin...@metlabs.com <mailto:krobin...@metlabs.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: geor...@lexmark.com
[SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 8:02 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance
S. William,
Thanks for the words on COs and TOs and SCCs.
Apparantly UL is one or
more of these, as the c-UL mark is legally
acceptable in Canada.
Now, what other COs has the SCC accredited to issue
an approved Canadian
mark? Not CSA, but alternatives to CSA?
George
---------------------- Forwarded by George
Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark on 11/23/99
07:57 AM ---------------------------
swilliam%apcc....@interlock.lexmark.com on 11/22/99
05:02:15 PM
To: George_Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark@LEXMARK
cc:
emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee....@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: George
Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance
George, Canada is not as straight forward as that.
There is not a mutual
agreement. In order for a lab to issue a Canadian
Approval Mark, the lab
must be accredited as a CO(Certifying Organization)
by the SCC(Standards
Council of Canada). The CO must use data that has
come from a TO(Testing
Organization) that is also accredited by the SCC.
Most labs that issue
their Canada Mark are both a CO and TO so it is very
easy for them. The
critical item is that the product has to have been
tested against the
relevant Canadian National Standard(very easy for
ITE as 1950 is a joint
standard).
If you want to do everything by the book, your US
Mark should be from an
NRTL certified by OSHA to the standards that apply
to your product and the
Canadian Mark must be from a CO accredited by the
SCC.
Please respond to geor...@lexmark.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc: (bcc: Steve Williams/SDD/NAM/APCC)
From: geor...@lexmark.com on 11/22/99 03:42 PM
Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance
I tried to recall NRTLs that were approved for
asessments of ITE to
UL1950. I did not overlook MET (listed in my note),
but may have
missed NTS which may fit this description. I'm not
sure the others
are sanctioned for listing of ITE under UL1950.
There are many NTRLs, including UL. There is no
"NRTL" mark, as all
NRTLs are legally equal. The mark of some NRTLs has
included the
letters "NRTL" as part of their mark, apparantly by
choice. The
CSA/NRTL mark is an example. To my knowledge, the
use of "NRTL" in
an agency's mark is not mandatory. CSA has recently
changed their
mark to drop the "NRTL" and simply show the CSA mark
with "US"
subscript for assessment to the U.S. stadnard.
However, Canada does not recognize the U.S. NRTLs to
assess an ITE
product to the Canadian standard. There is a mutual
agreement between
Canada and the U.S. that "allows" a UL assessment to
the Canadian ITE
safety standard. This results in the UL mark with a
subscript "C",
often called the "c-UL" mark. It is my
understanding that when the
Canadian government bids out ITE for its own use,
they tend to prefer
the CSA mark over the c-UL mark. This seems to
violate the "spirit"
of the agreement, but who can force them to do
otherwise?
George Alspaugh
(Some or all of the above may reveal ignorance on my
part, which can
be "cured" by more enlightened appends to follow.)
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
