At 14:19 26/08/2003 +0100, Gibling, Vic wrote:

>Did you get a satisfactory answer from the forum? I ask as I just been told
>by a test house that the ITT-Canon CGL Industrial power connector we had
>wanted to use as a primary coupler is not suitable - apparently should only
>be used with secondary circuits. ( I believe this is the connector my
>colleague (boss) proposed to you via the forum )
>
>We had assessed it against the 309 connectors for leading earth, creepage,
>clearance and isolation voltage. Alas the test house stated    "You will
>find that the contacts will quickly deteriorate if you were to carry out a
>mating/unmating endurance test at maximum current rating."
>



Were you going to use the contacts at maximum current rating?





This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to