Naw, he should go into computer systems/services.
Years ago at most firms there used to be a small position
often thought to be a nuisance function called "the
accountant". The accountant was a geeky type who basically
reported to the President. Over time that position has now
become synonymous with the presidential office often times
wielding more power than the pres.
Today there is a small position reporting to the president
also thought to be a nuisance function called "the computer
geek". He's the one who keeps the network up and running,
keeps everyone's systems runnning, and can turn the company
into a fast moving, virtual company. Over time I expect
that position to rise to a synonymous level as the
president/financial office.
Therefore, he should get into computer systems/services,
definitely avoid RF and EMC.
<grin>
- Robert -
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:48:57 -0700
[email protected] wrote:
> EMC and RF gurus:
>
> I was recently asked by a young engineer if RF/Microwaves
> would be a
> good path for him to take in graduate school. He has a
> strong interest
> and aptitude for analog and RF engineering.
>
> I think RF is a good move but I would like to get
> opinions from the rest
> of you.
>
> Dave
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
