John,
 
There are many members of this forum who participate in TC108 at either the
IEC or national level and therefore have a greater or lesser foresight into
the replacement standard for IEC 60065 and IEC 60950-1.  Reasonably
foreseeable future?  Well, that all depends what you mean by reasonable of
course...  Certainly years, not months - a first consolidated draft of the IEC
document (which has moved on a lot from its ECMA beginnings) hasn't yet been
put together.
 
You state as a fact that 60950 was drafted for commercially-used equipment and
does not always provide relevant levels of safety for domestic applications. 
I disagree with you and would remind you that this standard is listed in the
OJEC as an LVD standard.  Everyone I know on the committee and in the
Commission use telephones at home and I suspect that all of them also have or
use PCs at home, products covered by 60950-1.  If I thought that equipment
meeting 60950-1 was not safe to use in my home by my family then I would
certainly suggest changes, as - no doubt - would other members of TC108.
 
Richard Hughes
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to