Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'Radiated Emission Testing', on Tue, 22 Mar 2005:
> The ferrite clamps amendment (A1 to CISPR22:1998) did try to address >the problem and was roundly condemned by just about all parties, each >of which had their own set of interests to defend. Well, apart form the 'sets of interests', do you agree that it is technically unsound? At least, in specifying only the insertion loss of the ferrite, leaving open the question of whether the ferrite is absorbing the incident energy (good) or reflecting it back to the source (not good). -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. There are two sides to every question, except 'What is a Moebius strip?' http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
