Ken,
 
I can see the case of a battery operated device with only the one cable being
connected -- if it is electrically short, it is not likely to see much current
induced by a very low frequency field. However, if just the one cable is
short, but there are other long cables connected, I can see where the entire
system can become resonant and therefore the induced current on the short
cable can be higher than it would be otherwise.
 
Of course, I admit I am not anywhere near being an expert on antenna theory,
so my thinking could very well be flawed. :-)
 
Regardless, I believe the letter of the law should be followed, regardless of
how flawed it may be. It is worded the way it is worded. May not make sense,
but it is what it is.
 
Cheers,
 
Bob Richards, NCT.



Ken Javor <[email protected]> wrote:

I disagree with what I perceive is being stated here - that if any portion
of a system has a connection to a long conductor, then all system-attached
cables must be tested down to 150 kHz.

The purpose of the Annex B wording is to allow for basic physics to be
applied to the limit - short cables are inefficient pick-up at low
frequencies. It is the length of the individual cable-under-test which
should drive the low-frequency cut-off limit.

Ken Javor



- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________



Reply via email to