I disagree with what I perceive is being stated here - that if any portion
of a system has a connection to a long conductor, then all system-attached
cables must be tested down to 150 kHz.

The purpose of the Annex B wording is to allow for basic physics to be
applied to the limit - short cables are inefficient pick-up at low
frequencies.  It is the length of the individual cable-under-test which
should drive the low-frequency cut-off limit.

Ken Javor

> From: "Oliver Betz" <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:30:21 +0100
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Conducted immunity lower frequency
> 
> Bob Richards wrote:
> 
>> Twice recently I've seen where annex B of 61000-4-6 ed2.2 is
>> referenced by someone and used as a reason for not requiring testing
>> down to 150 kHz "since the cable is specified as being less than x
>> meters in length".  (Of course, this is after the EUT failed at a low
>> frequency!) 
> 
> Was Annex B applied correctly? Only very special setups are subject
> to higher starting frequencies, e.g. the keyboard attached to a
> battery powered PC, never used with AC adaptor.
> 
> Most devices are galvanically coupled to sources of low frequency
> disturbances, in this case the starting frequency must not be raised.
> 
> I read this from Annex B and it makes sense.
> 
> Oliver
> -- 
> Oliver Betz, Muenchen
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> Scott Douglas           [email protected]
> Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> David Heald:            [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to