In message <[email protected]>, dated Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes:
>if you are referring to the statement that IEC60065 is not adequate for >the evaluation of batteries AND chargers - if you want it, and >management approves the release, I will send you an analysis of various >standards vs the known failure modes of batteries and Class 2 power >sources. Otherwise, it is left as an exercise for the reader. Since your assertion is clearly your, or your company's, private opinion about an approved international standard, I see no merit in your position at present. If you wish to maintain your assertion, you should submit it to the IEC Central Office for the attention of the Secretary of IEC TC108, responsible for IEC 60065. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
