Surely 'information for the user..' has to accompany every unit and if the DofC has to accompany the information then it does not seem to me there is much room for doubt that the Directive requires a Declaration to accompany every unit. Can you explain the basis on which you think this is not the case?
On 30 Nov 2012, at 19:01, John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, dated > Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Nick Williams <[email protected]> writes: > >> AIUI, the R+TTE Directive also requires this, and there are others which do >> the same. > > Article 6 3. of the RTTED says: > > 3. Member States shall ensure that the manufacturer or > the person responsible for placing the apparatus on the > market provides information for the user on the intended > use of the apparatus, together with the declaration of > conformity to the essential requirements. > > Nowhere that I can find does it say a DoC has to accompany every unit. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
