In message
<[email protected]>,
dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]>
writes:
It?s covered in the Europa Interpretation of the R&TTE Directive:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/documents/interpretation/ind
ex_en.htm#h2-23
You mean it's politically fudged there. Having 'interpreted' the word
'the' to mean that every item has to have the DoC with it (!), it
settles for something quite different to be included in the user
instructions:
Hereby, [Name of manufacturer], declares that this [type of equipment]
is in compliance with the essential requirements and other relevant
provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
