In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Brian Jones <[email protected]> writes:

he principle is that the primary harmonised standard (in this case EN 54) sets the requirements, and the dated reference prevails over the edition listed in the OJ. However if EN 50130-4 is applied directly in its own right to a product, then the OJ dates are used.

This is very good advice, but I think there is another aspect that should be considered.

WHY is it necessary for a committee to review dated cross-references in its standards?

If the new edition of the referenced standard contains the same, or effectively the same, text as the previous edition, then simple updating is desirable, if not strictly necessary according to Brian's statement of the rule.

But if the new edition does NOT contain relevant text, then action almost certainly needs to be taken. For example, the cross-reference could be to a requirement, or even a whole method of measurement, that has been abandoned or superseded.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to