Hi Matt,

Your detail explanation is much appreciated!

Regards,

Scott

On 28 April 2016 at 01:27, Larkin, Matthew <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Scott
>
>
>
> In relation to EN60950-1 & EN 60065  Annex ZA details normative
> referenced standards such as EN62133 and how to determine the revision to
> utilise.
>
>
>
> If using a Harmonised standard to assist the demonstration of conformity
> to a EU Directive the OJ should be used to determined if it is still valid.
> If a appropriate standard for your product is not detailed in the OJ you
> may as appropriate use International & National standards etc. A European
> standard approved by CENELEC has the status of a National standard in
> member countries.
>
>
>
> If using a European Standard not listed in the OJ the status of the
> standard is generally detailed in the standard itself.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> Matthew Larkin
> TÜV SÜD Product Service
> Tel: +44 (0) 1489 558212
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 27 April 2016 17:14
> *To:* Scott Aldous; Larkin, Matthew
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
>
>
>
> Scott & Matt,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your information.  Should we consider in this way that for
> product scope in EN 60065 or 60950-1, the effective date should follow the
> publication in OJEU and for batteries, DOW of 10/01/2016 is applied as per
> standard stated.  Currently EN 62133 is not included in LVD or GPSD - of
> course we cannot find any reference from OJEU.
>
>
>
> On 27 April 2016 at 23:35, Scott Aldous <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> See the last paragraph of the Austrian National Foreword in this preview
> <https://shop.austrian-standards.at/Preview.action;jsessionid=6309A0F60DB57CF4295DE51A402136B7?preview=&dokkey=507572&selectedLocale=en>.
> I didn't see a similar note in other country national forewards that I
> could find.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Scott Xe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
>
> Where did you get dow of 10/01/2016?
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From:* Larkin, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:54 PM
> *To:* Leber, Jody (Suwanee); [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
>
>
>
> Hi Jody
>
> The dow date is 2016-01-10; so 10th January 2016 for EN62133 for
> conflicting National standards to be withdrawn.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Matthew
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> *From: *Leber, Jody (Suwanee) <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent: *‎26/‎04/‎2016 17:58
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Subject: *Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
>
> I actually thought the dow was in October.  Where did you see the July
> date?  I do not believe it is any Directive as most batteries are outside
> of the scope of the LVD.  You will find in end product standards and it is
> required for CB Scheme.
>
>
>
> 8.3.9: Design evaluation – Forced internal short circuit only applies to
> Korea,
>
> Japan, Switzerland and France.
>
>
>
> It is not clear about the enforcement of 8.3.9, because that is country
> difference.  Can it be enforced for the EU?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> *Jody Leber*
>
> *Consumer and Retail*
>
> Global Battery and Accumulator Technical Manager
>
> Battery and Performance Laboratory Manager
>
>
> Direct: 770.570.1838
>
> Main: 770.570.1800
>
> Mobile: 678.469.9835
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
> [email protected]&GT;
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas &LT;[email protected]&GT;
> Mike Cantwell &LT;[email protected]&GT;
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher &LT;[email protected]&GT;
> David Heald &LT;[email protected]&GT;
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Scott Aldous
>
> Compliance Engineer
>
> Google
>
> 650-253-1994
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to