I'm not too surprised that a more or less 'out-of-the blue' enquiry aroused suspicions. I think IEEE should adopt and promote the 'Design it in!' movement, so that test houses could be 'encouraged' to provide the categorized data, wholly anonymized. Those data would form a strong part of the movement's platform. With best wishes OOO – Own Opinions Only <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England From: Jim Bacher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 3:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Meet some of the list admins at the PSES Symposium next week John, for EMC (and safety) most of the labs do not want to provide details as to what the failures were. One lab that does both safety and EMC, happened to mention that the 90% rule applied to safety as well as EMC, but would no discuss details, nor do they want me to mention their name. It points out we need to do a better job in the development stage of products..
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
