Igor Chudov wrote: > I used Linux since 1995. I do not personally see the point of having /usr > mounted separately. > The idea, I think, is that the /boot file system, and maybe the /root file system, also, are nearly static. A static file system is a lot less likely to get corrupted. If a power failure, hard drive or memory error, etc. corrupts the /usr file system, at least you can boot the OS and start trying to repair the damage.
I have some systems set up this way. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
