On 10/10/2014 03:45 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 10 October 2014 21:22, Dave Cole <linuxcncro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I really think this is a bug. I can't see any useful purpose for the
>> G92 offsets working this way. It seems very unintentional.
> The only time I have used a G92 was when I had some subs for cutting
> panel holes for connectors.
> The main program positioned the cutter at the middle of each connector
> hole, then the sub was called for the required connector.
>
> The first thing that each sub did was to call the starting position
> (0,0) using G92, then it cut the shape relative to that.
>
> In that scenario I think that it was correct to cancel the G92 on
> program end or stop.
>
This was exactly how I used G92 in the old days. An
explicit command to cancel the
offset would be a lot better, in my opinion, that an
automatic cancellation whenever
you might have to abort in the middle of a program.
Jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
