Having "messed with" both the  gantry component and thanks for writing 
that and JA now Master. I much prefer JA homing. Much more straight 
forward to me.

A couple of vids showing my testing of JA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OtWNuLWfwc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNLd6A34Vo

JT

On 8/25/2016 12:18 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 8/25/2016 11:38 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
>> So I guess it does do that.  Now if one home was physically
>> installed where it trips 0.53" before physical end-of-travel, if
>> this were NOT the gantry axis I'd just give its final machine coord
>> as 0.53" and its machine coord is correct (0=end-of-travel).  But
>> in this one, say one gantry switch is mounted to trip at 0.5" but
>> the other trips at 0.65".  If homing acts like non-gantry joints,
>> it would physically leave it at 0.5" and 0.65" and leave joint mode
>> with it physically out of sync like that.  Which would mean the
>> joints are racked by 0.15" and will forever be locked like that
>> because future moves are in axis mode, not joint mode.
>>
>> Does it have the ability to physically move the joints into
>> alignment based on .ini parameters saying one switch is 0.15" off,
>> or do I just need to keep physically remounting one switch until
>> its trip point is "close enough" to the other?
> No.  On the machines I wrote the gantry component for, typically there
> is a small screw used to adjust the tripping point for each homing switch.
>
> As Andy mentioned, you may want to just use a version of LinuxCNC that
> supports JA.  When I wrote the gantry component that wasn't an option,
> and the behavior of LinuxCNC with any non-trivial kinematics (even
> something as simple as a gantry) was very painful from a user
> perspective (or at least from *THIS* user's perspective).  I haven't
> messed with JA, but it's supposedly *MUCH* better at handling these
> sorts of machines.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to