Same here every machine I have used (12 years CNC machining).  negative z
is always towards the chuck.

Or on a mill brings the tool down to table. Or table up towards tool



On Tue, 6 Feb 2024, 09:23 Sam Sokolik, <samco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Even the k&t with a discrete component 60's control had smaller numbers
> towards the spindle...
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 1:36 PM <marcus.bow...@visible.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Leaving aside right or left hand rules etc, leaning your head towards
> > your left shoulder shows that the relationship between the spindle and
> > the carriage is the same as on a vertical mill.
> > To bring the spindle closer to the carriage is a move in the -Z
> > direction.
> > If the argument is about the tool position, with the work in the chuck,
> > tilt your head to the right and you now have the tool on the right and
> > the work on the left, like a mill with the tool above (on the right) and
> > work in the chuck below (on the left0. Now the movement of the tool
> > towards the work is still -Z.
> >
> > Marcus
> >
> >
> > On 2024-02-05 18:01, John Dammeyer wrote:
> > > There's been an interesting discussion on the Unimat users list about
> > > axis direction.  As usual someone can always find something on the web
> > > that supports their opinion.
> > > For example this one:
> > > https://digit-chain.com/names-of-axes-in-cnc-machine/
> > >
> > > However I disagree that movement towards the rotating axis, be it the
> > > chuck on a lathe or the spinning cutter in a mill spindle,  is a Z+
> > > direction.  Doesn't even seem intuitive to me either.
> > >
> > > Now it's true that you can set the Z=0.00 position anywhere in the
> > > G54... spaces depending on what you touch off on.  And then a movement
> > > toward the spindle could be positive.  But in an G53 machine
> > > coordinate space isn't a Z- direction towards the spinning tool or
> > > part?
> > >
> > > That's the way I have my LCNC system and MACH system set up.  Even my
> > > ELS is negative towards the lathe chuck.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to