On 12/02/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:09:35 +0000 Nathan Baxter > <nathanbax...@pixelmasochist.net> said: > > i would KILL for someone to take charge of www... do the css, html, any php > (please keep it simple - php is adequate. no fancy cms's or frameworks > thanks)... and take charge of any gfx/design as well. pull together > people/team > to do it too AND to keep maintaining it over time... i'd LOVe that... no toes > being stepped on. i'd also just like it to complement our current default > theme/look. :) not clash. :)
That shouldn't be a problem, I've been studying the default to try and wrap my head round edje (no joy) and a lot of what I've come up with so far relies on the current look of the base site anyway, just different methods of implementation. I do need to spend a little more time with php, but I'm confident enough (far more confident than I am with edje - which is why I *still* haven't released any dr17 themes.). > > hre's the catch - it'd be bad to half do it then vanish. :) so if you want to > "commit" then by all means... you are more than invited! all you need is > commit > access. the rest is already automated. if you "get" how the current simple php > works - you can build and change from there as you see fit (theres the u.php > that triggers an update if you open it in any browser for example... :)). I appreciate that. As previously mentioned I haven't made any major advances in theme land since DR16 and I know I said before (2005 I think) that I'd remain commited to keeping up to date and trying to stay involved, but at least I didn't drop 23 Ounces of Glass 2 on any one ;) As for commit access: I'll keep plugging at this externally for the rest of the week, if at the end of this time I feel I've made a significant and substantial improvement a commit bit would be useful, otherwise I'll keep plugging at it until we're all happy! Alternatively I could start small and branch out, the only problem with that is <td>'s don't float ;) How far back does browser support need to go? >> Would I be stepping on anyones toes by giving the site a responsive >> overhaul? >> >> My main reason for asking this is that the EFL is aimed at mobile >> technologies as well as the desktop, where as the website currently >> isn't. This will mean a massive restructure of the page flow, but I >> think it will be worth it to allow more devices to view the site proper >> on one code base (not using m.enlightenment.org etc...) >> >> I have done some prelimanary (and not ready for public consumption) >> design ideas, but thought I'd better check that no one else is on this >> and I'm not going to be upsetting anyone. Also, is there a need/want for >> this to happen? >> >> If it's deemed a worthy pursuit all I'll need is a list of required >> browsers to support. I've got enough VM's set up to go back to IE6 if >> necessary. >> >> Cheers Chaps(esses) >> >> Nathan >> >> -- >> >> >> pixelmasochist.net : it all heppens there. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer >> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 >> and get the hardware for free! Learn more. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > -- pixelmasochist.net : it all heppens there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
