On 12/02/13 14:02, Nathan Baxter wrote: > On 12/02/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:09:35 +0000 Nathan Baxter >> <[email protected]> said: >> >> i would KILL for someone to take charge of www... do the css, html, any php >> (please keep it simple - php is adequate. no fancy cms's or frameworks >> thanks)... and take charge of any gfx/design as well. pull together >> people/team >> to do it too AND to keep maintaining it over time... i'd LOVe that... no toes >> being stepped on. i'd also just like it to complement our current default >> theme/look. :) not clash. :) > > That shouldn't be a problem, I've been studying the default to try and > wrap my head round edje (no joy) and a lot of what I've come up with so > far relies on the current look of the base site anyway, just different > methods of implementation. I do need to spend a little more time with > php, but I'm confident enough (far more confident than I am with edje - > which is why I *still* haven't released any dr17 themes.). > >> >> hre's the catch - it'd be bad to half do it then vanish. :) so if you want to >> "commit" then by all means... you are more than invited! all you need is >> commit >> access. the rest is already automated. if you "get" how the current simple >> php >> works - you can build and change from there as you see fit (theres the u.php >> that triggers an update if you open it in any browser for example... :)). > I appreciate that. As previously mentioned I haven't made any major > advances in theme land since DR16 and I know I said before (2005 I > think) that I'd remain commited to keeping up to date and trying to stay > involved, but at least I didn't drop 23 Ounces of Glass 2 on any one ;) > > As for commit access: I'll keep plugging at this externally for the rest > of the week, if at the end of this time I feel I've made a significant > and substantial improvement a commit bit would be useful, otherwise I'll > keep plugging at it until we're all happy! Alternatively I could start > small and branch out, the only problem with that is <td>'s don't float ;) > > How far back does browser support need to go? >>> Would I be stepping on anyones toes by giving the site a responsive >>> overhaul? >>> >>> My main reason for asking this is that the EFL is aimed at mobile >>> technologies as well as the desktop, where as the website currently >>> isn't. This will mean a massive restructure of the page flow, but I >>> think it will be worth it to allow more devices to view the site proper >>> on one code base (not using m.enlightenment.org etc...) >>> >>> I have done some prelimanary (and not ready for public consumption) >>> design ideas, but thought I'd better check that no one else is on this >>> and I'm not going to be upsetting anyone. Also, is there a need/want for >>> this to happen? >>> >>> If it's deemed a worthy pursuit all I'll need is a list of required >>> browsers to support. I've got enough VM's set up to go back to IE6 if >>> necessary. >>> >>> Cheers Chaps(esses) >>> >>> Nathan >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> pixelmasochist.net : it all heppens there. >>>
Could this be ?!?!?!?! Do my eyes deceive me ?? The return of pixelhead and his glorious themes ???? Please say it is so .... dh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
