On 12/02/13 14:15, Christopher Michael wrote: > On 12/02/13 14:02, Nathan Baxter wrote: >> On 12/02/13 13:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:09:35 +0000 Nathan Baxter >>> <[email protected]> said: >>> >>> i would KILL for someone to take charge of www... do the css, html, >>> any php >>> (please keep it simple - php is adequate. no fancy cms's or frameworks >>> thanks)... and take charge of any gfx/design as well. pull together >>> people/team >>> to do it too AND to keep maintaining it over time... i'd LOVe >>> that... no toes >>> being stepped on. i'd also just like it to complement our current >>> default >>> theme/look. :) not clash. :) >> >> That shouldn't be a problem, I've been studying the default to try and >> wrap my head round edje (no joy) and a lot of what I've come up with so >> far relies on the current look of the base site anyway, just different >> methods of implementation. I do need to spend a little more time with >> php, but I'm confident enough (far more confident than I am with edje - >> which is why I *still* haven't released any dr17 themes.). >> >>> >>> hre's the catch - it'd be bad to half do it then vanish. :) so if >>> you want to >>> "commit" then by all means... you are more than invited! all you >>> need is commit >>> access. the rest is already automated. if you "get" how the current >>> simple php >>> works - you can build and change from there as you see fit (theres >>> the u.php >>> that triggers an update if you open it in any browser for example... >>> :)). >> I appreciate that. As previously mentioned I haven't made any major >> advances in theme land since DR16 and I know I said before (2005 I >> think) that I'd remain commited to keeping up to date and trying to stay >> involved, but at least I didn't drop 23 Ounces of Glass 2 on any one ;) >> >> As for commit access: I'll keep plugging at this externally for the rest >> of the week, if at the end of this time I feel I've made a significant >> and substantial improvement a commit bit would be useful, otherwise I'll >> keep plugging at it until we're all happy! Alternatively I could start >> small and branch out, the only problem with that is <td>'s don't >> float ;) >> >> How far back does browser support need to go? >>>> Would I be stepping on anyones toes by giving the site a responsive >>>> overhaul? >>>> >>>> My main reason for asking this is that the EFL is aimed at mobile >>>> technologies as well as the desktop, where as the website currently >>>> isn't. This will mean a massive restructure of the page flow, but I >>>> think it will be worth it to allow more devices to view the site >>>> proper >>>> on one code base (not using m.enlightenment.org etc...) >>>> >>>> I have done some prelimanary (and not ready for public consumption) >>>> design ideas, but thought I'd better check that no one else is on this >>>> and I'm not going to be upsetting anyone. Also, is there a >>>> need/want for >>>> this to happen? >>>> >>>> If it's deemed a worthy pursuit all I'll need is a list of required >>>> browsers to support. I've got enough VM's set up to go back to IE6 if >>>> necessary. >>>> >>>> Cheers Chaps(esses) >>>> >>>> Nathan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> pixelmasochist.net : it all heppens there. >>>> > > Could this be ?!?!?!?! Do my eyes deceive me ?? > > The return of pixelhead and his glorious themes ???? > > Please say it is so .... > > dh > Website first, themes later! (thanks for the vote of confdence btw)
-- pixelmasochist.net : it all heppens there. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
