On 18/02/14 20:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 16:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 18/02/14 16:31, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:24:29 +0100 Stefan Schmidt >>>> <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> >>>> said: >>>> >>>>> Hello. >>>>> >>>>> Back from vacation and done with crawling through mails. >>>>> >>>>> I'm now pondering in what state the release is right now. I have seen >>>>> bug fixes coming in but also seen more bug reports coming in. >>>>> >>>>> The beta release tarball will slip a day from today to tomorrow due to >>>>> my catchup today. >>>>> >>>>> What I also ponder is if we are ready next Monday. What do you folks >>>>> think about it? >>>>> >>>>> I would be a ok with a one week slip (final release on 03.03.2014). Do >>>>> we have bugs that are worth waiting this one week? Would it help or >>>>> not? >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> Stefan Schmidt >>>> >>>> in terms of bugs efl hasnt gotten worse, just people are filing lots of >>>> bugs, >>>> and many of those are being cleared up. i went through a small coverity >>>> scan >>>> blast too. imho we should work on bugs even after release, but we're not >>>> too >>>> bad as it stands. >>> >>> I just released the beta1 and if we are happy with the codebase we can >>> release next week. I f not we can delay for one week, but not more. >> >> I was about to troll, but before that, a serious question: what's your >> plan for if there are still open major bugs at that point? Blindly >> release? :) >> Point is, delays are inevitable when there are major issues. > > Is this a plain theoretical question or are you seeing a major issue > which needs to get addressed? This mail was about to bring them out of > the shadows into the light. > > This has to be decided on a case by case basis. Normally people overrate > problems they experience on their own. They think its a showstopper > while others can live with it being fixed in a stable update release. > > I would like to see concrete problems before delaying longer than a > week. A week is not choosen randomly by the way. If it is really > urgent it would be fixed in a week if not it might hang around for > some more weeks which makes it less urgent and I'm not willing to wait > that long. >
I haven't noticed anything, was just pointing out the non-statement. As I've said in my original email, I think we can continue as expected. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
