On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:13:07 +0000 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> On 18/02/14 20:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 16:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> On 18/02/14 16:31, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 08:35, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:24:29 +0100 Stefan Schmidt > >>>> <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> said: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello. > >>>>> > >>>>> Back from vacation and done with crawling through mails. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm now pondering in what state the release is right now. I have seen > >>>>> bug fixes coming in but also seen more bug reports coming in. > >>>>> > >>>>> The beta release tarball will slip a day from today to tomorrow due to > >>>>> my catchup today. > >>>>> > >>>>> What I also ponder is if we are ready next Monday. What do you folks > >>>>> think about it? > >>>>> > >>>>> I would be a ok with a one week slip (final release on 03.03.2014). Do > >>>>> we have bugs that are worth waiting this one week? Would it help or > >>>>> not? > >>>>> > >>>>> regards > >>>>> Stefan Schmidt > >>>> > >>>> in terms of bugs efl hasnt gotten worse, just people are filing lots of > >>>> bugs, and many of those are being cleared up. i went through a small > >>>> coverity scan blast too. imho we should work on bugs even after release, > >>>> but we're not too bad as it stands. > >>> > >>> I just released the beta1 and if we are happy with the codebase we can > >>> release next week. I f not we can delay for one week, but not more. > >> > >> I was about to troll, but before that, a serious question: what's your > >> plan for if there are still open major bugs at that point? Blindly > >> release? :) > >> Point is, delays are inevitable when there are major issues. > > > > Is this a plain theoretical question or are you seeing a major issue > > which needs to get addressed? This mail was about to bring them out of > > the shadows into the light. > > > > This has to be decided on a case by case basis. Normally people overrate > > problems they experience on their own. They think its a showstopper > > while others can live with it being fixed in a stable update release. > > > > I would like to see concrete problems before delaying longer than a > > week. A week is not choosen randomly by the way. If it is really > > urgent it would be fixed in a week if not it might hang around for > > some more weeks which makes it less urgent and I'm not willing to wait > > that long. > > > > I haven't noticed anything, was just pointing out the non-statement. As > I've said in my original email, I think we can continue as expected. as such here is how i see it. in phabricator we have "unbreak now" "showtopper" level bugs. these are bugs that delay a release. anything lower level than that is livable to various degrees. so... if the bug truly is that bad, file it on phab, raise it to the top priority and... then we know what will delay release... and what has to be worked on now. drop everything. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
