On 14/09/16 17:53, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Hacohen <t...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >> On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>>>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be >>>>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be >>>>>> our final call. We do now have time to cleanup example and check that >>>>>> things look fine. >>>>> >>>>> Please correct me if I did not get you two correctly here. >>>>> >>>>> You both think we should release 1.19 only once the interface work is >>>>> fully done? Be it in 3 months or in a year? >>>> >>>> I hope that we will be done by November. >>> >>> Hope dies last. :) >>> >>> More seriously. I have a hard time seeing that interfaces is fully done >>> in November when we still argue promises (as a very basic part) again. >> >> From what I remember, we decided promises will not take a key part in >> this. We will not rely on promises at this point. > > It was requested to have an eo based promise to make decision. Also it > was stated in that thread that there will not be any async request API > (like file_set should be) if we do not have promise. This also include > no MVC (We are not going back to insane complexity of handling it with > events and having to maintain another insane hydra). >
This is not true. It was requested to move them to Eo *and* it was also stated we should start slow and use them in only a few APIs to see how they are, and not rely on them in all of the EFL. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
