On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 04:30:05PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> here i agre with you. e.g. double-click to shade/roll up. even efl is bad here
> with csd. we don't do that (or support it in csd/client side). we SHOULD. it'd
> have to be a policy communicated between wm and apps or just some setting you
> set in elm settings or something... like "double click shades, maximizes, or
> does something else". i suspect gtk csd also is missing shading too as an
> option.
I'm sure they are, but if they weren't trying to get in the WM business,
they wouldn't have to care or support it :)

> imagine no longer:
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/F12631
> it does look stupid indeed.

Thanks for the example. I'll agree that it does not look great, but I'll
personally take this over losing shading.
What's stupid (to me) is the app trying to do the WM's business, and
then doing it badly. 
Beinmg a WM is a lot of work, lots of things to get right, so let the WM
do the job :)

"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/                         | PGP 1024R/763BE901

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
enlightenment-users mailing list

Reply via email to