hey: I am special too :-)
In other words, what paul says is true here. Possibly you three don't have
the criteria set to "if any are true", and so the rule is not firing even
though it detects the domain fragment?
tim
On 17/5/01 10:43 PM, "Laurie A Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you are special, Paul, because I have the filter set to <From>
> <Contains>, and I assure you that it works as the three of us have stated --
> at least in the mailbox window.
>
> -Laurie
>
>
> On 5/17/01 12:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] showcased stellar typing and
> language skills in this message:
>
>> On 5/16/01 4:57 PM, "Laurie A Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Deb is correct. You cannot filter by domain from the filter box in the
>>> browser window, UNLESS there is no other name before the address.
>>>
>>> For example -- if I am looking for all email from
>>>
>>> Allen Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (this is how your mail comes to the
>>> list)
>>>
>>> I can filter for Allen or Watson, but I CANNOT filter for mac.com
>>>
>>> However, if Allen's mail arrived without his name, simply as
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with or without the address duplicated in the name
>>> field), I can filter for mac.com without a problem.
>>
>> As I said to Deborah:
>>
>> It sounds as if you have the filter's popup set to "starts with". Switch it
>> to "contains" and you'll find everyone with a mac.com domain without
>> problem.
>>
>> I found Allen's, and lots of other mac.com domain users, by typing "mac.com"
>> with the popup set to <From> <contains> "mac.com".
>
Dr Timothy Bates <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science (MACCS)
Macquarie University
Ph 61 (2) 9850 8623
Fx 61 (2) 9850 6059
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
