Title: Re: anti-aliasing (off-topic)
Not quite - the opposite actually. You trade off the information at 45º angles to get a higher resolution at vertical and horizontal with the same data volume. You do not need the high spatial frequency information on the diagonals since you cannot see it anyway.
If you want a good masters project that potentially could lead to some interesting patents and financial opportunities in the future, rebuild the JPEG and MPEG systems with a rectangular to hexagonal conversions for the front and back end (encode and decode) with the compression occurring in a hexagonal system.
on 3/28/02 3:15 PM, Timothy Bates at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmmm. So with a hexagonal grid you would trade off a loss in information
> present at 0-90-180-270-360 orientations, for a compensatory gain in the
> intermediate rotations?
--
Eric Hildum
- Spam flter Bonnie Barrett
- Re: Spam flter Steve Sell
- Re: Spam flter Christian M. M. Brady
- Searching John R. Draxler
- Re: Searching Beth Rosengard
- Re: anti-aliasing Timothy Bates
- Re: anti-aliasing Timothy Bates
- Re: anti-aliasing Eric Hildum
- Re: anti-aliasing Timothy Bates
- Re: Searching Eric Hildum
- Re: Searching John R. Draxler
- Re: Searching Allen Watson
- Re: Searching Beth Rosengard
- Re: Searching Barry Wainwright
- Re: Searching Beth Rosengard
- Mac MS Office discussi... Jeffrey Jolando Sim
- Re: Mac MS Office disc... Beth Rosengard
- Re: Mac MS Office disc... Jeffrey Jolando Sim
- Re: Searching Barry Wainwright
- Re: Searching Allen Watson
