On 3/15/06 12:27 PM, "Jud Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/15/06 9:25:19 AM, "Swenson, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But it's a HUGE problem for people with network homes, or people that want >> to redirect the Documents to a network share. > > I don't understand why you say this. If your home folder is on a Network, > Entourage will open its database from there. > Because the database is big, and it's redundant. It pushes people over quota and the information it contains is already in our Exchange database. >> One of these days I'd like to hear the real reason why Entourage lacks MAPI. > > Plain and simple, Entourage was initially designed to not be Outlook. It was > an explicit goal to not be Outlook for the Mac. There was an Outlook for the > Mac. When Outlook for Mac was killed, Entourage had to pick up the ball. At > this point, MAPI is not the best solution for that. > How is working with live Exchange data, rather than redundant and insecure synching, not a good thing? -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
