Randy, ENTS-

Yes, the Tulip I measured to 159.4' had a dead patch on the down-slope side
is definitely the one you measured to 162.6'--you have the mountain-goat
ability as someone 28 years younger to explore the possibilities from a
better vantage point!  I'm sure it's the same tree. The Bitternut is really
nice also.  I'll re-figure the R. I. with your measurements. This makes the
area even more impressive and exceptional; I always thought the trees where
I grew up were tall, but I never knew for sure until ENTS.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Randy Brown <[email protected]>wrote:

> Steve,
>
> Here are the numbers I got from the trip.   After we split up I went back
> and went up the same ravine and measured some more trees ('Steep Ravine' in
> the chart below:
>
>   Sand Run Akron (11/14/09)
>
>
>
>
>  cbh
>
>
>   Entry Cove
>
>
>
>   Tuliptree
>  ?
>
>  153.3'
>   Tuliptree
>  ?
>
>  145.1'
>   Slippery Elm
>  ?
>
>  121.2'
>   Sand Run Slope
>
>
>
>   Sycamore
>  7'
>  10”
>  122.0'
>   Black Walnut
>  ?
>
>  106.7'
>   Green/White Ash
>  11'
>  1.0”
>  131.8'
>   Basswood
>  7'
>  5.5”
>  116.8'
>   Tuliptree
>  9'
>  9.0”
>  142.7'
>   Cottonwood
>  7'
>  5.0”
>  125.4'
>   Steep Ravine:
>
>
>
>   Beech
>  7'
>  5.0”
>  132.0'
>   Tuliptree
>  ?
>
>  151.9'
>   Tuliptree
>  14'
>  8.5”
>  162.6'
>   Bitternut Hickory
>  5'
>  11.0”
>  141.8'
>   Tuliptree
>  ?
>
>  147.8'
>   Uphill Slopes
>
>
>
>   Tuliptree
>  13'
>  8.5"
>  ~133'
>   Red Oak
>  9'
>  8.5"
>  129.3'
>
> I measured the 162' tulip from the ridge top (It's the one with the big
> dead patch in the base).  I believe it's the same one you measured to 159'.
> The 151' tulip tree and the 141' Bitternut hickory were growing right
> beside each other.
>
> As an asside the tallest beaches I've found in Ohio are at Old Mans
> Cave/hocking hills growing on opposite sides of the same cove.  8' 2" x
> 135.8" & 7' 7.5" x 130.1'
> (I measured both these trees on two separate occasions so they better be
> correct)
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Steve Galehouse wrote:
>
>
>
> Randy, ENTS-
>
> I returned to Sand Run this weekend and remeasured the beech--the best I
> could get was 132', but I think this figure is accurate. I explored up the
> ravine where the beech was found(actually hiked a ridge and came down
> through the narrow valley) and found some more fantastic tulip-trees, the
> largest was about 200-300 yards up the ravine from the beech. This tree was
> 14' 6'' CBH. I got a nearly straight up measurement of 52 yards at 85
> degrees for 155.4', plus 4' for my eye level measured above grade for 159.4'
> (!). A nearly 160' height for a Tulip in N Ohio is pretty good, I think.
> Also found a 134.5' Red Oak.
>
> There is also grove of Tulip-trees at the base of the hills that has many
> trees in the 8'-10' CBH and 140'-150' range. All the trees in the summary
> below were found within about a half-mile of each other, and there are many
> more areas of the park to explore, so I hope to increase the R.I. with more
> searching. Species present but not measured yet are Hemlock, Basswood,
> Cucumber-tree, Tupelo, Sugar, Black, and Red Maples and Hackberry, plus
> others I'm sure. This area is very accessible, on the north end of Akron 30
> minutes from the Ohio Turnpike; I would encourage any ENTS types traveling
> across Ohio consider a visit.
>
> Tuliptree                      159.4    14' 6''    41' 08.030    81' 33.697
> Red Oak                     134.5                41' 08.139    81' 33.647
> American Beech          132                   41' 08.177    81' 33.914
> Walnut                        125
> Black Cherry               125
> Cottonwood                 124
> Bitternut Hickory          123.7
> White Ash                   123
> Sycamore                   121.95
> Slippery Elm               121
>
> R I                             128.95
>
> Black Oak                  117.6
> White Oak                  103
> Butternut                     95
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Randy Brown 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I've gone back through my notes on this beech tree.  We shot the tree
>> from the point of the view in the picture.  The lower site line was 2˚
>> @ 76.5 yards = 8.01'.  Normally you add the lower site line because
>> the base of the tree is almost always below your eye point when
>> shooting on 'level ground'.  However, as you can see in the picture of
>> the tree, the base is actually uphill from the shooter.  The
>> foreshortening of the zoom lense of the camera makes this more
>> noticeable than it was in person.   I think there is a reasonable
>> chance we should be subtracting 8' instead of adding, giving one
>> 127.6'.    I think we need to withdraw this number until this tree can
>> be remeasured.
>>
>> Sorry Guys,
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jess Riddle wrote:
>>
>> > Steve,
>> >
>> > Beech rarely dominant sites in the southeast, except at high
>> > elevations.  It does occur scattered at multiple sites with 170'
>> > tuliptrees, but still struggles to reach 120'.  I've never been to a
>> > tall tree site where beech was the second tallest species.
>> >
>> > It would be great to see some black maple numbers from a fertile site.
>> >
>> > Jess
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/15/09, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> From: Steve Galehouse <[email protected]>
>> >> Date: Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:32 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Sand Run revisited
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jess, ENTS-
>> >>
>> >> I didn't realize the beech was that exceptional---its height must
>> >> be due to
>> >> its location in the valley and competition with the tuliptrees; I
>> >> think
>> >> Randy measured the circumference also. I'm no sure how frequent a
>> >> tuliptree/beech association is in the south, but tulips are by far
>> >> the
>> >> predominant tree in this area, followed by beech. The latitude is N
>> >> 41' 08.
>> >> The aspect of the site was that of a relatively young forest in
>> >> vigorous
>> >> growth, with most trees having tall, straight, clean boles(see red
>> >> oak
>> >> photo), with hardly any gnarl factor, other than the 157' tulip in
>> >> the
>> >> earlier photo. The soils and topography must greatly influence the
>> >> growth
>> >> potential.
>> >>
>> >> Other measured trees were a bitternut hickory at 123.7', red oak at
>> >> 124.7',
>> >> slippery elm at 121', white ash at 123', and sycamore at 121.95'.
>> >> As I
>> >> mentioned earlier, sugar/black maples were relatively scarce, but
>> >> in the
>> >> 120' range. The canopy height in a general sense was 120-130'.
>> >> Most of the
>> >> mature tulips were 130-140'. Other nice trees were black and white
>> >> oaks, and
>> >> basswood, which I plan to measure later this year, as well as
>> >> hemlock which
>> >> are in a different area of the park.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Attached are a Rucker height index, which will likely increase with
>> >> different species, and a few more photos.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Tuliptree                    158.1    8'4''    N 41' 08.030    W
>> >> 81' 33.697
>> >> Bitternut Hickory        123.7
>> >> Red Oak                    124.7             N 41' 07.986    W 81'
>> >> 33.728
>> >> Slippery Elm              121
>> >> American Beech         143.6
>> >> White Ash                  123
>> >> Sycamore                  121.95
>> >> Walnut                       106
>> >> Butternut                     95
>> >> Cottonwood                 124
>> >>
>> >> R.I. Height                   124.1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Eastern Native Tree Society
>> >> http://www.nativetreesociety.org
>> >> Send email to [email protected]
>> >> Visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
>> >> To unsubscribe send email to
>> >> [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
>> > Send email to [email protected]
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
>> > To unsubscribe send email to 
>> > [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
>>
>> --
>> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
>> Send email to [email protected]
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
>> To unsubscribe send email to 
>> [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]<Tulip-tree
> 159.4><Tulip-tree 159.4 B><Tulip-tree 159.4 C><Beech 132' top.jpg><Ravine
> up.jpg><Ravine down.jpg><Red Oak 134.5'><Tulip-tree grove.jpg>
>
>
>  --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to 
> [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
>

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to