> I need a wide angle, and would like opinions about the 24 TS-E and the
> 24 1.4L.
>
> While I don't do "architectural" work per se, I've heard the TS is
> beneficial even for landscapes, which for me often includes trees and
> barns. The secondary use would be casual, outdoor portraits.
>
> For 90% of my pictures, the difference in speed between the two won't
> matter.
>
> My main hesitation with the TS is that it's not available in auto focus.
>
> Thanks for your input.
Can I recommend (again) the fabulous EF 20-35 f3.5 USM lens for your
purposes. Not only is it sharp and contrasty but zooms back to 35 which
would be perfect for non closeup portraits you mention. It's autofocus is
very very fast and precise. Besides, with the money you save, you can get
another lens. It's small and light, but very well built. Blue sky photos
look like you used a polarizer. Heck, you don't need a polarizer with this
lens.
Jim Davis
Website: http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/
"Every footstep must be true."
- Bruce Cockburn
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
