Frederico Samarane wrote:
> From: Rick Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I just received my 28-135mm f/3.5-4.6 IS and love the IS feature.
> > If you had this lens, would you consider adding the 70-200 f/2.8 L
> > at some time?
>
> Hi Rick, I decided for this, I have complementing my 28-135 IS one EF 20 2.8
> and the EF 200 2.8 L. the best thing is that all have 72 filters.
Personally, I would agree with Fred on this, although I might go with the 24/2.8
instead of the 20 mm--but that's entirely a matter of personal preference. I
think you will be pleasantly surprised by the outstanding results you can
achieve with the 200/2.8L. BTW, if you do get the 200, if you ever use a tripod
the accessory tripod collar, while perhaps a bit overpriced, is well worth
having. And if you stick a 25 mm extension tube on the 200 you get a decent
macro lens; plus, it makes a fine 280/4 when used with the 1.4x extender. Come
to think of it, you might be hard-pressed to find a more versatile
fixed-focal-length lens, and *very* hard-pressed to find a zoom lens that can
match its optical performance. I might even go so far as to say that anyone who
uses a telephoto lens on a regular basis should own this lens!
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
