----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I can't agree ! :)
> The 70-200 2,8 is a L lens, which is very used by pros & serious amaters.
> It's optically (far) better than the 28-135IS they are not in the same
> range. I think that for the 28-135 IS and a futur 70-200 2,8L IS, there is
> no overlapping at all.

On this, I would agree with Daniel.  For me, the two lenses have
considerably different uses.  Therefore, even if you do get some over-lap on
focal lengths, the real issue is under what conditions and in what shooting
situation do you use each lens.

Gary Russell



*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to