----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I can't agree ! :) > The 70-200 2,8 is a L lens, which is very used by pros & serious amaters. > It's optically (far) better than the 28-135IS they are not in the same > range. I think that for the 28-135 IS and a futur 70-200 2,8L IS, there is > no overlapping at all. On this, I would agree with Daniel. For me, the two lenses have considerably different uses. Therefore, even if you do get some over-lap on focal lengths, the real issue is under what conditions and in what shooting situation do you use each lens. Gary Russell * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Rick Huebner
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Frederico Samarane
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Ken Cravillion
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Skip
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Gary Russell
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Rafal Walas
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Skip
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Dan Honemann
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Robert Meier
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Wallace, Brian
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
