From: "Daniel ROCHA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 19 grudnia 2000 19:27
Subject: Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8
> From: Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello Skip !
>
> > to me, it wouldn't make much
> > sense to buy this lens, since it has such a great degree of overlap with
> > the 28-135 IS, which I already own. What I'd like to see is an upgrade
>
> I can't agree ! :)
> The 70-200 2,8 is a L lens, which is very used by pros & serious amaters.
> It's optically (far) better than the 28-135IS they are not in the same
> range. I think that for the 28-135 IS and a futur 70-200 2,8L IS, there is
> no overlapping at all.
> And overlapping is not a really problem. For example the 17-35L overlap
with
> the 28-70L buy nobody who wants to have one of such a lens, will not buy
it,
> because they have already the other one...
> A _good_ 75-300 lens is a piece of equipment very hard to produce (I
think).
> And perhaps the only way to make it, is to use great advanced
technologies,
> and certainly to use the same material that in an L lens. Therefore the
> 75-300 is the entry level and the 100-400 L The pro level.
Hi Skip,
Daniel IS 100% right.
When I bought 70-200 and 100-400 I've forgotten about 75-300.
Those L and consumer lenses are completely different.
Not only sharpness is important but also colour saturation, contrast etc.
Buy or rent an L lens and you'll SEE the difference easily !!!
All the best,
Rafal A. Walas
==================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +48 601 083 450
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
